Posts Tagged ‘Packaging’


One Cup Coffee at a Time – The Sustainable Way

Friday, March 9th, 2012
Aero Press

The AeroPress

My wife Gail and I are self proclaimed coffee snobs. We like our coffee strong, robust and fresh. We have been buying whole bean coffee and  grinding our own beans since 1978, and have had every kind of coffee brewer, espresso maker and French Press you can imagine. My wife and I are now empty nesters. Our son Joshua is married with a family of his own. Our daughter Michelle is away at college. We no longer need to make a full pot of coffee every morning. But, we are strong believers in sustainability and recycling so we will never ever buy one of the fancy expensive single cup coffee makers that are so popular.

These one cup coffee machine, such as the Keurig and Tassimo, seem to have become ubiquitous. I see their little “k-cups” and coffee pods everywhere. Although expensive, many people have opted for the convenience  offered by these single serving coffee systems. According to the Los Angeles Times, in the 12 months ending in November, nearly 46% of the dollars going toward the purchase of coffee or espresso makers went to single-serve machines. The L.A. times story reports that according to Keurig 13% of all US offices has one of their machines.

The problem with this is that single servings of anything, by definition, have more packaging and create more waste than buying the same product in bulk. In this case, the environmental impact is complicated by the difficulty in recycling the single serving k-cups and pods. Tim Wall at Discovery News points out that the k-cups are made of a plastic shell, lined with a paper filter and topped with aluminum. Individually, the components are recyclable, but put together they can only be trashed. What’s more, the compostable coffee grounds are trapped inside.

So how to make a single or double cup of really good coffee while staying true to our core values? The answer turned out to be a $30 little plastic coffee maker called the AeroPress. I had kept coming across references to it in different blogs but couldn’t find it in any local store. The reviews were simply amazing. As explained by Mike Crimmins in his Daily Shot of Coffee Blog, the Aeropress came from inventor Alan Adler, who is best known for his Aerobie flying ring and similar toys. He took a scientific approach to making coffee and came up with the Aeropress.

The Aeropress is a simple machine. According to Gizmag the AeroPress delivers the smoothest, richest, purest and fastest cup of coffee (under 30 seconds) you’re likely to find.  The AeroPress can make up to four cups of great coffee at a time, much faster than my espresso machine or a single cup system. I have to agree and best of all, the only consumables used are the coffee grounds and the small paper filter, both of which are compostable.

 


Life cycle of Styrofoam, greener than you Think!

Thursday, December 8th, 2011


Styrofoam, just the sound of the word may send chills down the spines of many.

“Doesn’t that stuff NEVER break down?”

The answer is Yes. But there is more to the story. Styrofoam is actually Polystyrene aka Plastic, which has been infused by air to puff it up. We all know that air is a good insulator, so Styrofoam keeps your coffee warmer longer for this reason.

If you throw Styrofoam in the trash, then it will go to a landfill and will not break down for hundreds of years, maybe never! So what do we do about all of this foam waste?
Recycle it!

You got it! Styrofoam is actually very recyclable, but one of the least recycled materials because it is mostly air and therefore recyclers do not waste their time hauling it because the rates are too high.

Luckily, there are progressive companies like Dart Container in Mason, MI (outside Lansing) who have a polystyrene recycling facility and collect within a 100 square miles as well as accept deliveries of used Styrofoam. If you would like to learn more about Dart and their recycling initiative please read my article about it, which is based on a tour I took of their facility.

Recently, a life cycle analysis (LCA) was released by Cascades, Inc., which dispels many myths about the illustrious Styrofoam. The LCA demonstrates the vast capabilities of the material as well as calculating the ecological effects of its manufacture and use.

The study proves that polystyrene is actually a good choice for the environment, based on the fact that the impact of a material on the environment is determined by the type and amount of energy used to make it. Here’s what they found out:

  • Produced least amount of greenhouse gases throughout its entire lifecycle from raw material extraction to end-of-life.
  • Composed of 90 percent air.
  • Recyclable, though rarely recycled.
  • Using recycled polystyrene has tangible ecological benefits, using the recycled material results in less raw material extraction.

Designed to judge the environmental impact of Cascade’s food packaging trays, the LCA included 7 types of packaging materials.

  1. Foamed and oriented polystyrene (XPS and OPS) #6 Plastic.
  2. Standard and recycled polyethylene terephthalate (PET and RPET) #1 Plastic.
  3. Polylactic acid polymer (PLA) grouped with the #7 Plastic category.
  4. Polypropylene (PP) #5 Plastic.
  5. Molded pulp (made from recycled newspapers and telephone books).

The president of Cascades, Luc Langevin said:

“This analysis provides an new perspective on food packaging. The environmental performance of our trays is much better than popular belief. Polystyrene foam can now be part of our environmental packaging solution.”

“These findings have us taking stock of our current situation so that we can better understand our impact and thereby improve our efforts to reduce the environmental footprint left by our products.”

 

I hope that this post helps shed some light on the myth’s about Styrofoam. It is actually a very ecologically sound choice, thus why we use and recycle all of our Styrofoam cups here at Maxi. We hope that in the future, more companies and consumers start to understand the ecological benefits associated with choosing Styrofoam over paper cups. I urge you to please forward this post to someone whom you think would benefit from the information.

The full results of the LCA are available on cascades website.

Original article found though Packaging Diva published by JoAnne Hines.

You can read the original article by Cascade’s Inc. in The Sacramento Bee by following this link.


Reality-Based Recycling Labels

Monday, June 27th, 2011

The Sustainable Packaging Coalition (SPC) plans to update the labels used to differentiate recyclable material in consumer packaging. Recently, I have noticed more and more “green-washing” done by companies who advertise that their product is “recyclable”. Though this statement may be true, often this message confuses the consumer, whom at a glance may think it is made from recycled material. Also, even if a company claims that their product is recyclable, that does not always mean that recycling for that specific material is available in your area. To clear up all the confusion, so we all can see this issue clearly, the SPC has decided to update the labeling system for various recyclable materials into four categories.

These categories include:

  • Widely recycled – for materials like glass, cardboard, and PET plastic bottles.
  • Limited recycling – for materials that are only recycled in 20% to 60% of the U.S., such as #5 yogurt containers or medicine bottles.
  • Not recycled – for materials that are rarely recycled, such as Styrofoam*
  • Store drop-off – for the bags and plastic film that are generally collected by retailers for recycling.
*For more information about Styrofoam recycling, please read our article about Dart Container and their Styrofoam recycling initiative by clicking here.

What does all this mean for you, the consumer? It means simply that the materials you receive all of your favorite products in, and the products themselves will be easier to identify if it is actually recyclable and how to recycle it. Of course, in different areas there are different recycling options available, but now consumers will know more clearly if their product or packaging is recyclable and what steps to take to get it to the right facility to take care of it. It may be as easy as curbside for some of you, or it could be a trip back to the place of purchase. Either way it will be easier to identify recyclable materials.

A limited number of SPC members will be participating in a test run of the project this fall that will run through 2011. SPC hopes that this new labeling system will eventually become universal.

Susan Freinkel, a blogger for Fast Company, wrote about an initiative that is underway to update the numbering systems on plastic containers. Hopefully we will see this system become implemented in the next 2-3 years. This new numbering system should take into account the greater variety of plastics now available in the market. Right now the market is flooded with a broad range of bio-plastics. Only some of these bio-plastics actually are biodegradable. As of now these bio-plastics are mixed into the #7 category along with other non-recyclables.

The recycling world is constantly changing as new materials are introduced into the market. The ability for recyclers to manage the materials they receive is essential to them being successful. The state of the recycling world right now (in particular plastics) is a mess. Bio-plastics along with other materials mislabeled as recyclable, when in actuality they are not recyclable or recycling for such materials is not easily accessible. Overall, the changes the SPC has proposed to help determine how readily available recycling is for specific materials and updating the plastics numbering system for recycling to include bio-plastics, could greatly benefit the recycling world.

Original article: Coalition to Introduce Reality-Based Recycling Labels
From
: SustainableBusiness.com
Enhanced by Zemanta